To address this, we are currently developing CARE111—an active computational decision-support system designed to ingest raw clinical observations from care workers, calculate risk using established medical frameworks, and immediately flag patients requiring urgent clinician review.
The core function of CARE111 evaluates whether a patient’s vital signs deviate significantly from their established baselines or standard acceptable ranges. The system processes six primary observations: Respiration Rate, Oxygen Saturations (SpO₂), Systolic Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, Level of Consciousness, and Temperature.
Rather than looking at these metrics in isolation, the architecture applies a dual-evaluation method. First, it integrates the NEWS2 framework to assign a clinical deterioration score. Second, it runs a comparative baseline analysis. For example, while a respiration rate of 22 might only trigger a moderate alert in a healthy adult, CARE111’s logic flags a critical warning if the patient’s baseline is typically 10-11.
This project is currently in active development. I am collaborating with Quine Schuuring to comprehensively map observation combinations—including edge cases where only a single parameter is severely out of range.
We are translating these clinical heuristics into a deterministic Python decision-engine. To ensure clinical validity, our hypotheses are undergoing rigorous review with a panel of practising clinicians across general practice and paediatrics (including Dr. Isaiah See, Dr. Minsari Ogega, Dr. Siddiq Shirgaonkar, and Dr. Angela Wang). Once the clinical logic is refined, the Python engine will be deployed as an open-source repository, laying the groundwork for a future predictive model.
]]>